Axiomatic Reasoning and Libertarianism

TBD page on the ways in which libertarians rely on strict a priori deductive reasoning and the implications of this.

Deontological Ethics
TBD (Include a link to NAP)

Do Consequences Matter?
Well, they do for most normal people! Because of this, you will often see libertarians arguing for the sure and certain (we promise) benefits of society constructed on the basis of their principles. However, this is never really the point. Any time that one can show that these beneficial outcomes are unlikely for some reason, they will fall back on the absolutely irrefutable morality established by their principles. In other words, when the consequences are beneficial, they count; otherwise, it's just very unfortunate how many perverse things we must accept in the name of liberty. (TBD: links to things like voluntary slavery, segregation/discrimination, goddamn baby markets, etc.)

Does Evidence Matter?
tl;dr: nope. (Praxeology, theoretical history, etc.)

TBD